Talk:Pseudodragon

Reference sources
I think someone misunderstood the point of a comment (not a note, but a comment) I left in the notes section. It was not referring to the 3.5 SRD because I thought SoU was based on 3.5; it referred to the 3.5 SRD because I located that before the 3.0 SRD. The entire reason that the note was worded vaguely and the comment attached to it is that I knew I was consulting the wrong SRD version (and some details were likely changed). Sorry, I thought that much was obvious. (Why would I try to hide details from the readers?) I did not have accurate details available, and the significance was low enough that I did not think it was worth spending more time on it.

In general, HTML comments are not for information that fits in the article. They get used as reminders to editors, such as reminders of things that might be easily overlooked. In this case, it was a reminder that the note could be improved (by finding the 3.0 SRD). Probably a weak reason for a comment, but I was being too lazy to leave a proper note here on the talk page. (And here I am making an even longer note on the talk page. Laziness is not working out the way it is supposed to.) --The Krit (talk) 20:50, August 11, 2012 (UTC)