(Official descriptions) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:I agree we could better clarify that the official description is unaltered -- warts and all. Who'd like to take up the task of creating a template that makes it clearer? :) -- [[User:Austicke|Alec Usticke]] 16:25, 16 June 2006 (PDT) |
:I agree we could better clarify that the official description is unaltered -- warts and all. Who'd like to take up the task of creating a template that makes it clearer? :) -- [[User:Austicke|Alec Usticke]] 16:25, 16 June 2006 (PDT) |
||
| + | |||
| + | ::I could do it if you were to describe and give a basic outline. But after next week only. Got exams. [[User:GhostNWN|GhostNWN]] 05:16, 17 June 2006 (PDT) |
||
Revision as of 12:16, 17 June 2006
Why not make a PROPPER feat description instead of writing wrong ones and then make corrections in the notes. I guess I will never understand that. But what do I care.--Kamiryn 12:33, 16 June 2006 (PDT)
- Heh, I made that error when I first started too, but do have a read at NWNWiki:Manual of style#Official descriptions. GhostNWN 12:48, 16 June 2006 (PDT)
If I want offical description I can read the manual. Giving a wrong description and writing something completly different in the notes will just confuse people - at best if they read the notes. Otherwise they just believe the wrong information.--Kamiryn 15:36, 16 June 2006 (PDT)
- I agree we could better clarify that the official description is unaltered -- warts and all. Who'd like to take up the task of creating a template that makes it clearer? :) -- Alec Usticke 16:25, 16 June 2006 (PDT)
- I could do it if you were to describe and give a basic outline. But after next week only. Got exams. GhostNWN 05:16, 17 June 2006 (PDT)