Talk: Cleric

Revision as of 01:19, 28 January 2010

Spells per day

there are no spells per day tables (that I can find) in the nwnwiki. should these be added to the class pages? or as separate ones? -- Jjjhhhlll 14:13, 21 Dec 2005 (PST)

I thought we did have those charts, but I sure can't find 'em. They're sorely needed. The class pages would be the best place I think. -- Austicke 14:21, 21 Dec 2005 (PST)

adding these using the standard table format... the sorcerer spells per level page has different formatting. Perhaps that way is better. I don't want to manually enter all that markup :( -- Jjjhhhlll 14:22, 21 Dec 2005 (PST)

Cleric domains

Having all the domains listed in the Cleric page seems a bit cluttered. Wouldn't a Domains category be better? Otherwise where will the PRC domains go? --Countess Terra 09:41, 4 January 2006 (PST)

- Good question. I don't mind a Cleric domains article or even a PRC cleric domains if we want to just keep that separate. -- Alec Usticke 21:49, 4 January 2006 (PST)

We could list the domain names, and link to an article for each domain from that.--Defunc7 12:00, 5 January 2006 (PST)

That still leaves the problem of where to put those domain pages. A separate category seems fitting. --Countess Terra 13:03, 5 January 2006 (PST)

Makes sense. Then the non-default stuff can go in a subcategory (like PRC domains). -- Alec Usticke 14:14, 5 January 2006 (PST)

I'm going to create the domains as separate pages. Since I'm not sure how to create a category yet, I'll put them in feats. Anyone who knows how to create a category is free to put them in a Domains category. --Countess Terra 13:40, 11 January 2006 (PST)

Easy way to do it is to fake a page in the non-existant category with [[Category:Domains]] in an edit-preview and click to go to the "non-existant page edit". NWN2Wiki:Cleric#Available_domains with NWN2Wiki:Category:Domains is the NWN2 setup. --Defunc7 13:47, 11 January 2006 (PST)

I'll try it. --Countess Terra 13:58, 11 January 2006 (PST)

All the domains are now their own separate articles and there's now a link on the Cleric page to the Cleric domains category.
--Countess Terra 14:27, 11 January 2006 (PST)

Scribe scroll, brew potion, craft wand

The Cleric does not (by default) get these feats. Fixing. --Countess Terra 09:39, 6 January 2006 (PST)

Spell focus: necromancy?

I don't see that the 2010/Jan/26 edit (Special abilities & feats note: "Cleric's should consider taking spell focus Necromancy as it affects almost all their spells") is accurate. Aside from the apostrophe issue, how would taking the necromancy spell focus feat affect "almost all [cleric] spells"? By my quick count, there are 19 general cleric necromancy spells (23 available with various domains) out of 126 general cleric spells (146 available with various domains). MrZork 18:09, January 27, 2010 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+== Spells per day ==
 * there are no spells per day tables (that I can find) in the nwnwiki. should these be added to the class pages? or as separate ones? -- [[User:Jjjhhhlll|Jjjhhhlll]] 14:13, 21 Dec 2005 (PST)
 *I thought we did have those charts, but I sure can't find 'em. They're sorely needed. The class pages would be the best place I think. -- [[User:Austicke|Austicke]] 14:21, 21 Dec 2005 (PST)
 * adding these using the standard table format... the sorcerer spells per level page has different formatting. Perhaps that way is better. I don't want to manually enter all that markup :( -- [[User:Jjjhhhlll|Jjjhhhlll]] 14:22, 21 Dec 2005 (PST)
-* I don't see that the 2010/Jan/26 edit (Special abilities & feats note: "Cleric's should consider taking spell focus Necromancy as it affects almost all their spells") is accurate. Aside from the apostrophe issue, how would taking the necromancy spell focus feat affect "almost all [cleric] spells"? By my quick count, there are 19 general cleric necromancy spells (23 available with various domains) out of 126 general cleric spells (146 available with various domains). [[User:MrZork|MrZork]] 18:09, January 27, 2010 (UTC)
 ==Cleric domains==
 *Having all the domains listed in the Cleric page seems a bit cluttered. Wouldn't a Domains category be better? Otherwise where will the PRC domains go? --[[User:Countess Terra|Countess Terra]] 09:41, 4 January 2006 (PST)
 **Good question. I don't mind a '''Cleric domains''' article or even a '''PRC cleric domains''' if we want to just keep that separate. -- [[User:Austicke|Alec Usticke]] 21:49, 4 January 2006 (PST)
 *We could list the domain names, and link to an article for each domain from that.--[[User:Defunc7|Defunc7]] 12:00, 5 January 2006 (PST)
 *''That still leaves the problem of where to put those domain pages. A separate category seems fitting.'' --[[User:Countess Terra|Countess Terra]] 13:03, 5 January 2006 (PST)
 *Makes sense. Then the non-default stuff can go in a subcategory (like '''PRC domains'''). -- [[User:Austicke|Alec Usticke]] 14:14, 5 January 2006 (PST)
 *I'm going to create the domains as separate pages. Since I'm not sure how to create a category yet, I'll put them in feats. Anyone who knows how to create a category is free to put them in a Domains category. --[[User:Countess Terra|Countess Terra]] 13:40, 11 January 2006 (PST)
 *Easy way to do it is to fake a page in the non-existant category with <nowiki>[[Category:Domains]]</nowiki> in an edit-preview and click to go to the "non-existant page edit". [[NWN2Wiki:Cleric#Available_domains]] with [[NWN2Wiki:Category:Domains]] is the NWN2 setup. --[[User:Defunc7|Defunc7]] 13:47, 11 January 2006 (PST)
 *I'll try it. --[[User:Countess Terra|Countess Terra]] 13:58, 11 January 2006 (PST)
 *All the domains are now their own separate articles and there's now a link on the [[Cleric]] page to the [[:Category:Cleric domains|Cleric domains]] category.<br />--[[User:Countess Terra|Countess Terra]] 14:27, 11 January 2006 (PST)
-== Scribe Scroll, Brew Potion, Craft Wand  ==
+== Scribe scroll, brew potion, craft wand  ==
 The Cleric does not (by default) get these feats. Fixing. --[[User:Countess Terra|Countess Terra]] 09:39, 6 January 2006 (PST)
+== Spell focus: necromancy? ==
+I don't see that the 2010/Jan/26 edit (Special abilities & feats note: "Cleric's should consider taking spell focus Necromancy as it affects almost all their spells") is accurate. Aside from the apostrophe issue, how would taking the necromancy spell focus feat affect "almost all [cleric] spells"? By my quick count, there are 19 general cleric necromancy spells (23 available with various domains) out of 126 general cleric spells (146 available with various domains). [[User:MrZork|MrZork]] 18:09, January 27, 2010 (UTC)