Ending mid-round[]
I don't see a good reason to document ways you can take advantage of bugs in the game. --The Krit (talk) 23:17, February 14, 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, TK. Pointing out exploits of the game engine limitations defeats what was intended by Bioware. Hopefully, we will not see more examples that's sole purpose is to seek to sidestep the D&D rule set.--Iconclast (talk) 20:15, February 16, 2015 (UTC)
- The poster has been given ample time to respond. Note removed. WhiZard (talk) 15:14, March 3, 2015 (UTC)
I'm the original poster and only just now noticed this. While I do agree it's a bug, and that using this is technicaly an exploit, I personally feel as though the purpose of a wiki page is to educate the user as to how the feat works in the game from every angle. If not here, then perhaps the information should be added to a bug page? 98.229.212.69 21:41, March 3, 2015 (UTC)
- I believe this is now documented here (on this talk page) as are quite a few other game engine exploits (on other talk pages). In general these things are not highlighted on main article pages as if to suggest that the feat was intended to be used this way. If it were an unintended result that the game itself applied (like an incorrect caster level for spells), then there would be a reason to display this on a main page. WhiZard (talk) 22:44, March 3, 2015 (UTC)
- If the note had stopped after the first sentence, I might have believed the intent was to document behavior, rather than to promote an exploit. (But even then, I would question the value of the documentation to someone trying to play the game honestly.) --The Krit (talk) 02:31, March 4, 2015 (UTC)
- Interesting note, got it from the page log. Thanks for posting it. --74.110.191.155 00:27, November 2, 2016 (UTC)